Continuous Entailment Patterns for Lexical Inference in Context
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Combining a pretrained language model (PLM) with textual patterns has been shown to help in both zero- and few-shot settings. For zero-shot performance, it makes sense to design patterns that closely resemble the text seen during self-supervised pretraining because the model has never seen anything else. Supervised training allows for more flexibility. If we allow for tokens outside the PLM's vocabulary, patterns can be adapted more flexibly to a PLM's idiosyncrasies. Contrasting patterns where a "token" can be any continuous vector vs. those where a discrete choice between vocabulary elements has to be made, we call our method CONtinuous pAtterNs (CONAN). We evaluate CONAN on two established benchmarks for lexical inference in context (LIiC) a.k.a. predicate entailment, a challenging natural language understanding task with relatively small training sets. In a direct comparison with discrete patterns, CONAN consistently leads to improved performance, setting a new state of the art. Our experiments give valuable insights into the kind of pattern that enhances a PLM's performance on LIiC and raise important questions regarding our understanding of PLMs using text patterns.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2021.
Builds on
27 of 38 references.
References · 27
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,878
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
- 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
- 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,255
- 2019How Can We Know What Language Models Know?cited by 953
- 2020Exploiting Cloze Questions for Few Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inferencecited by 934
15 more
- 2021GPT Understands, Toocited by 715
- 2020It's Not Just Size That Matters: Small Language Models Are Also Few-Shot Learnerscited by 668
- 2021Prompt Programming for Large Language Models: Beyond the Few-Shot Paradigmcited by 599
- 2021Measuring and Improving Consistency in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 361
- 2021WARP: Word-level Adversarial ReProgrammingcited by 220
- 2021How Many Data Points is a Prompt Worth?cited by 197
- 2018Breaking NLI Systems with Sentences that Require Simple Lexical Inferencescited by 134
- 2020The Turking Test: Can Language Models Understand Instructions?cited by 82
- 2021BERTese: Learning to Speak to BERTcited by 82
- 2019Inducing Relational Knowledge from BERTcited by 75
- 2019Probabilistic Models of Relational Implicationcited by 17
- 2020Paraphrasing vs Coreferring: Two Sides of the Same Coincited by 15
- 2021Multivalent Entailment Graphs for Question Answeringcited by 10
- 2021Language Models for Lexical Inference in Contextcited by 9
- 2019SherLIiC: A Typed Event-Focused Lexical Inference Benchmark for Evaluating Natural Language Inferencecited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3.
3 papers.