mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SSEGEP: Small SEGment Emphasized Performance evaluation metric for medical image segmentation

arXiv 2109.03435 ↗First posted 8 Sep 2021eess.IV cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automatic image segmentation is a critical component of medical image analysis, and hence quantifying segmentation performance is crucial. Challenges in medical image segmentation are mainly due to spatial variations of regions to be segmented and imbalance in distribution of classes. Commonly used metrics treat all detected pixels, indiscriminately. However, pixels in smaller segments must be treated differently from pixels in larger segments, as detection of smaller ones aid in early treatment of associated disease and are also easier to miss. To address this, we propose a novel evaluation metric for segmentation performance, emphasizing smaller segments, by assigning higher weightage to smaller segment pixels. Weighted false positives are also considered in deriving the new metric named, "SSEGEP"(Small SEGment Emphasized Performance evaluation metric), (range : 0(Bad) to 1(Good)). The experiments were performed on diverse anatomies(eye, liver, pancreas and breast) from publicly available datasets to show applicability of the proposed metric across different imaging techniques. Mean opinion score (MOS) and statistical significance testing is used to quantify the relevance of proposed approach. Across 33 fundus images, where the largest exudate is 1.41%, and the smallest is 0.0002% of the image, the proposed metric is 30% closer to MOS, as compared to Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC). Statistical significance testing resulted in promising p-value of order 10^{-18} with SSEGEP for hepatic tumor compared to DSC. The proposed metric is found to perform better for the images having multiple segments for a single label.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2021.

Builds on

7 of 38 references.

References · 7

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2017Generalised Dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentationscited by 614
  3. 2019A large annotated medical image dataset for the development and evaluation of segmentation algorithmscited by 371
  4. 2018A Novel Focal Tversky loss function with improved Attention U-Net for lesion segmentationcited by 171
  5. 2019Automated Design of Deep Learning Methods for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 27
  6. 2016Automatic 3D liver location and segmentation via convolutional neural networks and graph cutcited by 15
  7. 2019CEREBRUM: a fast and fully-volumetric Convolutional Encoder-decodeR for weakly-supervised sEgmentation of BRain strUctures from out-of-the-scanner MRIcited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.