mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

LEAF: Navigating Concept Drift in Cellular Networks

arXiv 2109.03011 ↗First posted 7 Sep 2021cs.NI cs.LG cs.PFcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Operational networks commonly rely on machine learning models for many tasks, including detecting anomalies, inferring application performance, and forecasting demand. Yet, model accuracy can degrade due to concept drift, whereby the relationship between the features and the target to be predicted changes. Mitigating concept drift is an essential part of operationalizing machine learning models in general, but is of particular importance in networking's highly dynamic deployment environments. In this paper, we first characterize concept drift in a large cellular network for a major metropolitan area in the United States. We find that concept drift occurs across many important key performance indicators (KPIs), independently of the model, training set size, and time interval -- thus necessitating practical approaches to detect, explain, and mitigate it. We then show that frequent model retraining with newly available data is not sufficient to mitigate concept drift, and can even degrade model accuracy further. Finally, we develop a new methodology for concept drift mitigation, Local Error Approximation of Features (LEAF). LEAF works by detecting drift; explaining the features and time intervals that contribute the most to drift; and mitigates it using forgetting and over-sampling. We evaluate LEAF against industry-standard mitigation approaches (notably, periodic retraining) with more than four years of cellular KPI data. Our initial tests with a major cellular provider in the US show that LEAF consistently outperforms periodic and triggered retraining on complex, real-world data while reducing costly retraining operations.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2021.

Builds on

15 of 87 references.

References · 15

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  3. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,239
  4. 2020Learning under Concept Drift: A Reviewcited by 477
  5. 2018On the Robustness of Interpretability Methodscited by 314
  6. 2016Visualizing the Effects of Predictor Variables in Black Box Supervised Learning Modelscited by 213
  7. 2018CatBoost: gradient boosting with categorical features supportcited by 208
  8. 2015On Wasserstein Two Sample Testing and Related Families of Nonparametric Testscited by 166
  9. 2015Characterizing Concept Driftcited by 94
  10. 2013Correlation and variable importance in random forestscited by 41
  11. 2020Reactive Soft Prototype Computing for Concept Drift Streamscited by 40
  12. 2017Hot or not? Forecasting cellular network hot spots using sector performance indicatorscited by 2
3 more
  1. 2020The Lockdown Effect: Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Internet Trafficcited by 2
  2. 2020A Characterization of the COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on a Mobile Network Operator Trafficcited by 1
  3. 2020Characterizing Service Provider Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United Statescited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 4.

9 papers.