mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dutch Comfort: The limits of AI governance through municipal registers

arXiv 2109.02944 ↗First posted 7 Sep 2021cs.AI cs.CY cs.DBcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this commentary, we respond to a recent editorial letter by Professor Luciano Floridi entitled 'AI as a public service: Learning from Amsterdam and Helsinki'. Here, Floridi considers the positive impact of these municipal AI registers, which collect a limited number of algorithmic systems used by the city of Amsterdam and Helsinki. There are a number of assumptions about AI registers as a governance model for automated systems that we seek to question. Starting with recent attempts to normalize AI by decontextualizing and depoliticizing it, which is a fraught political project that encourages what we call 'ethics theater' given the proven dangers of using these systems in the context of the digital welfare state. We agree with Floridi that much can be learned from these registers about the role of AI systems in municipal city management. Yet, the lessons we draw, on the basis of our extensive ethnographic engagement with digital well-fare states are distinctly less optimistic.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Sep 2021.

Builds on

2 of 44 references.

References · 2

  1. 2020Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelligencecited by 100
  2. 2020Combating Anti-Blackness in the AI Communitycited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

4 papers.