Increasing Adversarial Uncertainty to Scale Private Similarity Testing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Social media and other platforms rely on automated detection of abusive content to help combat disinformation, harassment, and abuse. One common approach is to check user content for similarity against a server-side database of problematic items. However, this method fundamentally endangers user privacy. Instead, we target client-side detection, notifying only the users when such matches occur to warn them against abusive content. Our solution is based on privacy-preserving similarity testing. Existing approaches rely on expensive cryptographic protocols that do not scale well to large databases and may sacrifice the correctness of the matching. To contend with this challenge, we propose and formalize the concept of similarity-based bucketization~(SBB). With SBB, a client reveals a small amount of information to a database-holding server so that it can generate a bucket of potentially similar items. The bucket is small enough for efficient application of privacy-preserving protocols for similarity. To analyze the privacy risk of the revealed information, we introduce a framework for measuring an adversary's confidence in inferring a predicate about the client input correctly. We develop a practical SBB protocol for image content, and evaluate its client privacy guarantee with real-world social media data. We then combine SBB with various similarity protocols, showing that the combination with SBB provides a speedup of at least 29x on large-scale databases compared to that without, while retaining correctness of over 95%.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.
3 papers.
- 2022How Different Groups Prioritize Ethical Values for Responsible AIcited by 49
- 2025Should LLMs be WEIRD? Exploring WEIRDness and Human Rights in Large Language Modelscited by 7
- 2025Are We Aligned? A Preliminary Investigation of the Alignment of Responsible AI Values between LLMs and Human Judgmentcited by 0
- 2025Are We Aligned? A Preliminary Investigation of the Alignment of Responsible AI Values between LLMs and Human Judgment6 Nov 2025
- 2025Should LLMs be WEIRD? Exploring WEIRDness and Human Rights in Large Language Models22 Aug 2025
- 2022How Different Groups Prioritize Ethical Values for Responsible AI16 May 2022