mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Effect of the output activation function on the probabilities and errors in medical image segmentation

arXiv 2109.00903 ↗First posted 2 Sep 2021eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The sigmoid activation is the standard output activation function in binary classification and segmentation with neural networks. Still, there exist a variety of other potential output activation functions, which may lead to improved results in medical image segmentation. In this work, we consider how the asymptotic behavior of different output activation and loss functions affects the prediction probabilities and the corresponding segmentation errors. For cross entropy, we show that a faster rate of change of the activation function correlates with better predictions, while a slower rate of change can improve the calibration of probabilities. For dice loss, we found that the arctangent activation function is superior to the sigmoid function. Furthermore, we provide a test space for arbitrary output activation functions in the area of medical image segmentation. We tested seven activation functions in combination with three loss functions on four different medical image segmentation tasks to provide a classification of which function is best suited in this application scenario.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2021.

Builds on

22 of 46 references.

References · 22

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  4. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  5. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  6. 2021The Medical Segmentation Decathloncited by 620
  7. 2019Kvasir-SEG: A Segmented Polyp Datasetcited by 588
  8. 2019Measuring Calibration in Deep Learningcited by 443
  9. 2017Tversky loss function for image segmentation using 3D fully convolutional deep networkscited by 228
  10. 2020Pitfalls of In-Domain Uncertainty Estimation and Ensembling in Deep Learningcited by 208
  11. 2016What makes ImageNet good for transfer learning?cited by 192
  12. 2020Medical Image Segmentation Using Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 163
10 more
  1. 2018Activation Functions: Comparison of trends in Practice and Research for Deep Learningcited by 130
  2. 2020A survey on modern trainable activation functionscited by 89
  3. 2021Unified Focal loss: Generalising Dice and cross entropy-based losses to handle class imbalanced medical image segmentationcited by 88
  4. 2018TernausNet: U-Net with VGG11 Encoder Pre-Trained on ImageNet for Image Segmentationcited by 76
  5. 2019Optimizing the Dice Score and Jaccard Index for Medical Image Segmentation: Theory & Practicecited by 71
  6. 2019Pad'e Activation Units: End-to-end Learning of Flexible Activation Functions in Deep Networkscited by 65
  7. 2021Is segmentation uncertainty useful?cited by 37
  8. 2018TernausNetV2: Fully Convolutional Network for Instance Segmentationcited by 25
  9. 2020Activate or Not: Learning Customized Activationcited by 21
  10. 2017The Lov'asz-Softmax loss: A tractable surrogate for the optimization of the intersection-over-union measure in neural networkscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.