Universal and Tight Online Algorithms for Generalized-Mean Welfare
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study fair and efficient allocation of divisible goods, in an online manner, among n agents. The goods arrive online in a sequence of T time periods. The agents' values for a good are revealed only after its arrival, and the online algorithm needs to fractionally allocate the good, immediately and irrevocably, among the agents. Towards a unifying treatment of fairness and economic efficiency objectives, we develop an algorithmic framework for finding online allocations to maximize the generalized mean of the values received by the agents. In particular, working with the assumption that each agent's value for the grand bundle of goods is appropriately scaled, we address online maximization of p-mean welfare. Parameterized by an exponent term p ∈ (-∞, 1], these means encapsulate a range of welfare functions, including social welfare (p=1), egalitarian welfare (p → -∞), and Nash social welfare (p → 0). We present a simple algorithmic template that takes a threshold as input and, with judicious choices for this threshold, leads to both universal and tailored competitive guarantees. First, we show that one can compute online a single allocation that O (√n log n)-approximates the optimal p-mean welfare for all p≤ 1. The existence of such a universal allocation is interesting in and of itself. Moreover, this universal guarantee achieves essentially tight competitive ratios for specific values of p. Next, we obtain improved competitive ratios for different ranges of p by executing our algorithm with p-specific thresholds, e.g., we provide O(log 3 n)-competitive ratio for all p∈ (frac-1log 2n,1). We complement our positive results by establishing lower bounds to show that our guarantees are essentially tight for a wide range of the exponent parameter.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 5; 2026: 3.
12 papers.
- 2022Overlap-based Vocabulary Generation Improves Cross-lingual Transfer Among Related Languagescited by 25
- 2022Welfare and Fairness in Multi-objective Reinforcement Learningcited by 20
- 2024p-Mean Regret for Stochastic Banditscited by 6
- 2025Online Fair Division with Additional Informationcited by 6
- 2025Approximate Proportionality in Online Fair Divisioncited by 4
- 2025Revisiting Social Welfare in Bandits: UCB is (Nearly) All You Needcited by 4
- 2024Automating Food Drop: The Power of Two Choices for Dynamic and Fair Food Allocationcited by 3
- 2025Online Fair Division for Personalized 2-Value Instancescited by 3
- 2026Improved Algorithms for Nash Welfare in Linear Banditscited by 2
- 2025Bandit Max-Min Fair Allocationcited by 1
- 2026Price of Fairness in Bandits: A Tight Minimax Characterizationcited by 1
- 2026Online Fair Division with Budget Constraintscited by 0
- 2026Online Fair Division with Budget Constraints25 Jul 2026
- 2026Price of Fairness in Bandits: A Tight Minimax Characterization15 Jul 2026
- 2026Improved Algorithms for Nash Welfare in Linear Bandits30 Jan 2026
- 2025Revisiting Social Welfare in Bandits: UCB is (Nearly) All You Need24 Oct 2025
- 2025Approximate Proportionality in Online Fair Division5 Aug 2025
- 2025Online Fair Division with Additional Information30 May 2025
- 2025Online Fair Division for Personalized 2-Value Instances28 May 2025
- 2025Bandit Max-Min Fair Allocation8 May 2025
- 2024p-Mean Regret for Stochastic Bandits14 Dec 2024
- 2024Automating Food Drop: The Power of Two Choices for Dynamic and Fair Food Allocation10 Jun 2024
- 2022Welfare and Fairness in Multi-objective Reinforcement Learning30 Nov 2022
- 2022Overlap-based Vocabulary Generation Improves Cross-lingual Transfer Among Related Languages3 Mar 2022