mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Inferring feature importance with uncertainties in high-dimensional data

arXiv 2109.00855 ↗First posted 2 Sep 2021cs.LG stat.ME stat.MLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Estimating feature importance is a significant aspect of explaining data-based models. Besides explaining the model itself, an equally relevant question is which features are important in the underlying data generating process. We present a Shapley value based framework for inferring the importance of individual features, including uncertainty in the estimator. We build upon the recently published feature importance measure of SAGE (Shapley additive global importance) and introduce sub-SAGE which can be estimated without resampling for tree-based models. We argue that the uncertainties can be estimated from bootstrapping and demonstrate the approach for tree ensemble methods. The framework is exemplified on synthetic data as well as high-dimensional genomics data.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2021.

Builds on

8 of 33 references.

References · 8

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  3. 2018Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensemblescited by 279
  4. 2020Explaining by Removing: A Unified Framework for Model Explanationcited by 218
  5. 2019Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley valuescited by 205
  6. 2021Shapley values for feature selection: The good, the bad, and the axiomscited by 54
  7. 2020Efficient computation and analysis of distributional Shapley valuescited by 38
  8. 2020Explaining predictive models with mixed features using Shapley values and conditional inference treescited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1.

2 papers.