Fiducial marker recovery and detection from severely truncated data in navigation assisted spine surgery
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fiducial markers are commonly used in navigation assisted minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) and they help transfer image coordinates into real world coordinates. In practice, these markers might be located outside the field-of-view (FOV), due to the limited detector sizes of C-arm cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) systems used in intraoperative surgeries. As a consequence, reconstructed markers in CBCT volumes suffer from artifacts and have distorted shapes, which sets an obstacle for navigation. In this work, we propose two fiducial marker detection methods: direct detection from distorted markers (direct method) and detection after marker recovery (recovery method). For direct detection from distorted markers in reconstructed volumes, an efficient automatic marker detection method using two neural networks and a conventional circle detection algorithm is proposed. For marker recovery, a task-specific learning strategy is proposed to recover markers from severely truncated data. Afterwards, a conventional marker detection algorithm is applied for position detection. The two methods are evaluated on simulated data and real data, both achieving a marker registration error smaller than 0.2 mm. Our experiments demonstrate that the direct method is capable of detecting distorted markers accurately and the recovery method with task-specific learning has high robustness and generalizability on various data sets.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Aug 2021.
Builds on
8 of 56 references.
References · 8
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2016Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networkscited by 4,527
- 2016Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Inverse Problems in Imagingcited by 433
- 2019On instabilities of deep learning in image reconstruction - Does AI come at a cost?cited by 212
- 2017Scale-Space Anisotropic Total Variation for Limited Angle Tomographycited by 7
- 2019Field of View Extension in Computed Tomography Using Deep Learning Priorcited by 6
- 2020Limited Angle Tomography for Transmission X-Ray Microscopy Using Deep Learningcited by 6
- 2019CT Field of View Extension Using Combined Channels Extension and Deep Learning Methodscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2024Artifact Reduction in 3D and 4D Cone-beam Computed Tomography Images with Deep Learning -- A Reviewcited by 5
- 2023BPF Algorithms for Multiple Source-Translation Computed Tomography Reconstructioncited by 3
- 2023OSNet & MNetO: Two Types of General Reconstruction Architectures for Linear Computed Tomography in Multi-Scenarioscited by 1
- 2025Efficient Image-to-Image Schr"odinger Bridge for CT Field of View Extensioncited by 1
- 2024Task-Specific Data Preparation for Deep Learning to Reconstruct Structures of Interest from Severely Truncated CBCT Datacited by 0
- 2025Efficient Image-to-Image Schr"odinger Bridge for CT Field of View Extension15 Aug 2025
- 2024Task-Specific Data Preparation for Deep Learning to Reconstruct Structures of Interest from Severely Truncated CBCT Data13 Sep 2024
- 2024Artifact Reduction in 3D and 4D Cone-beam Computed Tomography Images with Deep Learning -- A Review27 Mar 2024
- 2023OSNet & MNetO: Two Types of General Reconstruction Architectures for Linear Computed Tomography in Multi-Scenarios21 Sep 2023
- 2023BPF Algorithms for Multiple Source-Translation Computed Tomography Reconstruction30 May 2023