Feature Importance in a Deep Learning Climate Emulator
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a study using a class of post-hoc local explanation methods i.e., feature importance methods for "understanding" a deep learning (DL) emulator of climate. Specifically, we consider a multiple-input-single-output emulator that uses a DenseNet encoder-decoder architecture and is trained to predict interannual variations of sea surface temperature (SST) at 1, 6, and 9 month lead times using the preceding 36 months of (appropriately filtered) SST data. First, feature importance methods are employed for individual predictions to spatio-temporally identify input features that are important for model prediction at chosen geographical regions and chosen prediction lead times. In a second step, we also examine the behavior of feature importance in a generalized sense by considering an aggregation of the importance heatmaps over training samples. We find that: 1) the climate emulator's prediction at any geographical location depends dominantly on a small neighborhood around it; 2) the longer the prediction lead time, the further back the "importance" extends; and 3) to leading order, the temporal decay of "importance" is independent of geographical location. An ablation experiment is adopted to verify the findings. From the perspective of climate dynamics, these findings suggest a dominant role for local processes and a negligible role for remote teleconnections at the spatial and temporal scales we consider. From the perspective of network architecture, the spatio-temporal relations between the inputs and outputs we find suggest potential model refinements. We discuss further extensions of our methods, some of which we are considering in ongoing work.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2021.
Builds on
14 of 21 references.
References · 14
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
- 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,657
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
- 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 983
- 2018Visual Analytics in Deep Learning: An Interrogative Survey for the Next Frontierscited by 117
- 2020A Survey of Visual Analytics Techniques for Machine Learningcited by 56
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.