Justifying Groups in Multiwinner Approval Voting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Justified representation (JR) is a standard notion of representation in multiwinner approval voting. Not only does a JR committee always exist, but previous work has also shown through experiments that the JR condition can typically be fulfilled by groups of fewer than k candidates. In this paper, we study such groups -- known as n/k-justifying groups -- both theoretically and empirically. First, we show that under the impartial culture model, n/k-justifying groups of size less than k/2 are likely to exist, which implies that the number of JR committees is usually large. We then present efficient approximation algorithms that compute a small n/k-justifying group for any given instance, and a polynomial-time exact algorithm when the instance admits a tree representation. In addition, we demonstrate that small n/k-justifying groups can often be useful for obtaining a gender-balanced JR committee even though the problem is NP-hard.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2025Representative Ranking for Deliberation in the Public Spherecited by 2
- 2025A Linear Theory of Multi-Winner Votingcited by 1
- 2026Computing Thiele Rules on Interval Elections and their Generalizationscited by 1
- 2026Computing Thiele Rules on Interval Elections and their Generalizations4 May 2026
- 2025Representative Ranking for Deliberation in the Public Sphere19 Mar 2025
- 2025A Linear Theory of Multi-Winner Voting5 Mar 2025