mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Latent Tree Decomposition Parsers for AMR-to-Text Generation

arXiv 2108.12304 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2021cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Graph encoders in AMR-to-text generation models often rely on neighborhood convolutions or global vertex attention. While these approaches apply to general graphs, AMRs may be amenable to encoders that target their tree-like structure. By clustering edges into a hierarchy, a tree decomposition summarizes graph structure. Our model encodes a derivation forest of tree decompositions and extracts an expected tree. From tree node embeddings, it builds graph edge features used in vertex attention of the graph encoder. Encoding TD forests instead of shortest-pairwise paths in a self-attentive baseline raises BLEU by 0.7 and chrF++ by 0.3. The forest encoder also surpasses a convolutional baseline for molecular property prediction by 1.92% ROC-AUC.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2021.

Builds on

11 of 19 references.

References · 11

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,148
  4. 2018Junction Tree Variational Autoencoder for Molecular Graph Generationcited by 647
  5. 2016Incorporating Copying Mechanism in Sequence-to-Sequence Learningcited by 217
  6. 2020Directional Graph Networkscited by 132
  7. 2019Graph Transformer for Graph-to-Sequence Learningcited by 82
  8. 2018Graph-to-Sequence Learning using Gated Graph Neural Networkscited by 61
  9. 2017Neural AMR: Sequence-to-Sequence Models for Parsing and Generationcited by 56
  10. 2019Modeling Graph Structure in Transformer for Better AMR-to-Text Generationcited by 35
  11. 2017AMR-to-text Generation with Synchronous Node Replacement Grammarcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.