mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Tree Decomposition Attention for AMR-to-Text Generation

arXiv 2108.12300 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2021cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Text generation from AMR requires mapping a semantic graph to a string that it annotates. Transformer-based graph encoders, however, poorly capture vertex dependencies that may benefit sequence prediction. To impose order on an encoder, we locally constrain vertex self-attention using a graph's tree decomposition. Instead of forming a full query-key bipartite graph, we restrict attention to vertices in parent, subtree, and same-depth bags of a vertex. This hierarchical context lends both sparsity and structure to vertex state updates. We apply dynamic programming to derive a forest of tree decompositions, choosing the most structurally similar tree to the AMR. Our system outperforms a self-attentive baseline by 1.6 BLEU and 1.8 chrF++.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2021.

Builds on

9 of 22 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  4. 2016Incorporating Copying Mechanism in Sequence-to-Sequence Learningcited by 217
  5. 2019Graph Transformer for Graph-to-Sequence Learningcited by 82
  6. 2018Graph-to-Sequence Learning using Gated Graph Neural Networkscited by 61
  7. 2017Neural AMR: Sequence-to-Sequence Models for Parsing and Generationcited by 56
  8. 2018A Graph-to-Sequence Model for AMR-to-Text Generationcited by 56
  9. 2019Modeling Graph Structure in Transformer for Better AMR-to-Text Generationcited by 35

Built on by

Not cited yet.