mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Truly Perfect Samplers for Data Streams and Sliding Windows

arXiv 2108.12017 ↗First posted 26 Aug 2021cs.DScited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the G-sampling problem, the goal is to output an index i of a vector f ∈ℝn, such that for all coordinates j ∈ [n], [Pr[i=j] = (1 ± ε) fracG(fj)sumk∈[n] G(fk) + γ,] where G:ℝ → ℝ≥ 0 is some non-negative function. If ε = 0 and γ = 1/poly(n), the sampler is called perfect. In the data stream model, f is defined implicitly by a sequence of updates to its coordinates, and the goal is to design such a sampler in small space. Jayaram and Woodruff (FOCS 2018) gave the first perfect Lp samplers in turnstile streams, where G(x)=|x|p, using polylog(n) space for p∈(0,2]. However, to date all known sampling algorithms are not truly perfect, since their output distribution is only point-wise γ = 1/poly(n) close to the true distribution. This small error can be significant when samplers are run many times on successive portions of a stream, and leak potentially sensitive information about the data stream. In this work, we initiate the study of truly perfect samplers, with ε = γ = 0, and comprehensively investigate their complexity in the data stream and sliding window models. Abstract truncated due to arXiv limits; please see paper for full abstract.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

5 papers.