Fourier Neural Operator Networks: A Fast and General Solver for the Photoacoustic Wave Equation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Simulation tools for photoacoustic wave propagation have played a key role in advancing photoacoustic imaging by providing quantitative and qualitative insights into parameters affecting image quality. Classical methods for numerically solving the photoacoustic wave equation relies on a fine discretization of space and can become computationally expensive for large computational grids. In this work, we apply Fourier Neural Operator (FNO) networks as a fast data-driven deep learning method for solving the 2D photoacoustic wave equation in a homogeneous medium. Comparisons between the FNO network and pseudo-spectral time domain approach demonstrated that the FNO network generated comparable simulations with small errors and was several orders of magnitude faster. Moreover, the FNO network was generalizable and can generate simulations not observed in the training data.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2021.
Builds on
10 of 43 references.
References · 10
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
- 2017The Deep Ritz method: A deep learning-based numerical algorithm for solving variational problemscited by 581
- 2017Zero-Shot Learning -- A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Good, the Bad and the Uglycited by 536
- 2017Solving ill-posed inverse problems using iterative deep neural networkscited by 145
- 2019Learning to Optimize Multigrid PDE Solverscited by 79
- 2018Fully Dense UNet for 2D Sparse Photoacoustic Tomography Artifact Removalcited by 56
- 2017Model based learning for accelerated, limited-view 3D photoacoustic tomographycited by 45
- 2017Deep Learning for Photoacoustic Tomography from Sparse Datacited by 17
- 2019Limited View and Sparse Photoacoustic Tomography for Neuroimaging with Deep Learningcited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 5; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
10 papers.
- 2023Neural Operators for Accelerating Scientific Simulations and Designcited by 218
- 2022Towards Multi-spatiotemporal-scale Generalized PDE Modelingcited by 190
- 2022Clifford Neural Layers for PDE Modelingcited by 91
- 2022Physics-Informed Machine Learning: A Survey on Problems, Methods and Applicationscited by 88
- 2023Towards Stability of Autoregressive Neural Operatorscited by 54
- 2023Out-of-distributional risk bounds for neural operators with applications to the Helmholtz equationcited by 32
- 2023Improved generalization with deep neural operators for engineering systems: Path towards digital twincited by 19
- 2023Neural Operator: Is data all you need to model the world? An insight into the paradigm of data-driven scientific MLcited by 8
- 2025Latent Mamba Operator for Partial Differential Equationscited by 8
- 2024CoNO: Complex Neural Operator for Continous Dynamical Physical Systemscited by 3
- 2025Latent Mamba Operator for Partial Differential Equations25 May 2025
- 2024CoNO: Complex Neural Operator for Continous Dynamical Physical Systems1 Jun 2024
- 2023Neural Operators for Accelerating Scientific Simulations and Design27 Sep 2023
- 2023Towards Stability of Autoregressive Neural Operators18 Jun 2023
- 2023Neural Operator: Is data all you need to model the world? An insight into the paradigm of data-driven scientific ML30 Jan 2023
- 2023Out-of-distributional risk bounds for neural operators with applications to the Helmholtz equation27 Jan 2023
- 2023Improved generalization with deep neural operators for engineering systems: Path towards digital twin17 Jan 2023
- 2022Physics-Informed Machine Learning: A Survey on Problems, Methods and Applications15 Nov 2022
- 2022Towards Multi-spatiotemporal-scale Generalized PDE Modeling30 Sep 2022
- 2022Clifford Neural Layers for PDE Modeling8 Sep 2022