mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explainability Auditing for Intelligent Systems: A Rationale for Multi-Disciplinary Perspectives

arXiv 2108.07711 ↗First posted 5 Aug 2021cs.CYcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

National and international guidelines for trustworthy artificial intelligence (AI) consider explainability to be a central facet of trustworthy systems. This paper outlines a multi-disciplinary rationale for explainability auditing. Specifically, we propose that explainability auditing can ensure the quality of explainability of systems in applied contexts and can be the basis for certification as a means to communicate whether systems meet certain explainability standards and requirements. Moreover, we emphasize that explainability auditing needs to take a multi-disciplinary perspective, and we provide an overview of four perspectives (technical, psychological, ethical, legal) and their respective benefits with respect to explainability auditing.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

7 papers.