mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Independent Ethical Assessment of Text Classification Models: A Hate Speech Detection Case Study

arXiv 2108.07627 ↗First posted 19 Jul 2021cs.CY cs.CL cs.IRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

An independent ethical assessment of an artificial intelligence system is an impartial examination of the system's development, deployment, and use in alignment with ethical values. System-level qualitative frameworks that describe high-level requirements and component-level quantitative metrics that measure individual ethical dimensions have been developed over the past few years. However, there exists a gap between the two, which hinders the execution of independent ethical assessments in practice. This study bridges this gap and designs a holistic independent ethical assessment process for a text classification model with a special focus on the task of hate speech detection. The assessment is further augmented with protected attributes mining and counterfactual-based analysis to enhance bias assessment. It covers assessments of technical performance, data bias, embedding bias, classification bias, and interpretability. The proposed process is demonstrated through an assessment of a deep hate speech detection model.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2021.

Builds on

12 of 28 references.

References · 12

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  3. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  4. 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 956
  5. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 736
  6. 2019Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 521
  7. 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 384
  8. 2019Predicting the Type and Target of Offensive Posts in Social Mediacited by 271
  9. 2017Word Embeddings Quantify 100 Years of Gender and Ethnic Stereotypescited by 253
  10. 2020Social Biases in NLP Models as Barriers for Persons with Disabilitiescited by 182
  11. 2018Reducing Gender Bias in Abusive Language Detectioncited by 152
  12. 2020Why Fairness Cannot Be Automated: Bridging the Gap Between EU Non-Discrimination Law and AIcited by 81

Built on by

Not cited yet.