mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Implicitly Regularized RL with Implicit Q-Values

arXiv 2108.07041 ↗First posted 16 Aug 2021cs.LGcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Q-function is a central quantity in many Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms for which RL agents behave following a (soft)-greedy policy w.r.t. to Q. It is a powerful tool that allows action selection without a model of the environment and even without explicitly modeling the policy. Yet, this scheme can only be used in discrete action tasks, with small numbers of actions, as the softmax cannot be computed exactly otherwise. Especially the usage of function approximation, to deal with continuous action spaces in modern actor-critic architectures, intrinsically prevents the exact computation of a softmax. We propose to alleviate this issue by parametrizing the Q-function implicitly, as the sum of a log-policy and of a value function. We use the resulting parametrization to derive a practical off-policy deep RL algorithm, suitable for large action spaces, and that enforces the softmax relation between the policy and the Q-value. We provide a theoretical analysis of our algorithm: from an Approximate Dynamic Programming perspective, we show its equivalence to a regularized version of value iteration, accounting for both entropy and Kullback-Leibler regularization, and that enjoys beneficial error propagation results. We then evaluate our algorithm on classic control tasks, where its results compete with state-of-the-art methods.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2021.

Builds on

23 of 37 references.

References · 23

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,093
  2. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,656
  3. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,310
  4. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,163
  5. 2018Soft Actor-Critic Algorithms and Applicationscited by 1,185
  6. 2017Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 777
  7. 2015Dueling Network Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 772
  8. 2019Solving Rubik's Cube with a Robot Handcited by 702
  9. 2017Learning Complex Dexterous Manipulation with Deep Reinforcement Learning and Demonstrationscited by 687
  10. 2018Maximum a Posteriori Policy Optimisationcited by 320
  11. 2019A Theory of Regularized Markov Decision Processescited by 281
  12. 2017Bridging the Gap Between Value and Policy Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 178
11 more
  1. 2016Continuous Deep Q-Learning with Model-based Accelerationcited by 150
  2. 2020Acme: A Research Framework for Distributed Reinforcement Learningcited by 146
  3. 2017Action Branching Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 90
  4. 2020Munchausen Reinforcement Learningcited by 68
  5. 2019Discretizing Continuous Action Space for On-Policy Optimizationcited by 65
  6. 2017Discrete Sequential Prediction of Continuous Actions for Deep RLcited by 50
  7. 2015Increasing the Action Gap: New Operators for Reinforcement Learningcited by 49
  8. 2019Improving Exploration in Soft-Actor-Critic with Normalizing Flows Policiescited by 37
  9. 2020Leverage the Average: an Analysis of KL Regularization in RLcited by 33
  10. 2017Trust-PCL: An Off-Policy Trust Region Method for Continuous Controlcited by 29
  11. 2019Quinoa: a Q-function You Infer Normalized Over Actionscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 3.

9 papers.