mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Select Wisely and Explain: Active Learning and Probabilistic Local Post-hoc Explainability

arXiv 2108.06907 ↗First posted 16 Aug 2021cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Albeit the tremendous performance improvements in designing complex artificial intelligence (AI) systems in data-intensive domains, the black-box nature of these systems leads to the lack of trustworthiness. Post-hoc interpretability methods explain the prediction of a black-box ML model for a single instance, and such explanations are being leveraged by domain experts to diagnose the underlying biases of these models. Despite their efficacy in providing valuable insights, existing approaches fail to deliver consistent and reliable explanations. In this paper, we propose an active learning-based technique called UnRAvEL (Uncertainty driven Robust Active Learning Based Locally Faithful Explanations), which consists of a novel acquisition function that is locally faithful and uses uncertainty-driven sampling based on the posterior distribution on the probabilistic locality using Gaussian process regression(GPR). We present a theoretical analysis of UnRAvEL by treating it as a local optimizer and analyzing its regret in terms of instantaneous regrets over a global optimizer. We demonstrate the efficacy of the local samples generated by UnRAvEL by incorporating different kernels such as the Matern and linear kernels in GPR. Through a series of experiments, we show that UnRAvEL outperforms the baselines with respect to stability and local fidelity on several real-world models and datasets. We show that UnRAvEL is an efficient surrogate dataset generator by deriving importance scores on this surrogate dataset using sparse linear models. We also showcase the sample efficiency and flexibility of the developed framework on the Imagenet dataset using a pre-trained ResNet model.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2021.

Builds on

20 of 32 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  3. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  4. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  5. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  6. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  7. 2017One pixel attack for fooling deep neural networkscited by 579
  8. 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 440
  9. 2019Explanations can be manipulated and geometry is to blamecited by 215
  10. 2018Explaining Explanations in AIcited by 136
  11. 2020Reliable Post hoc Explanations: Modeling Uncertainty in Explainabilitycited by 125
  12. 2019DLIME: A Deterministic Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations Approach for Computer-Aided Diagnosis Systemscited by 59
8 more
  1. 2020BayLIME: Bayesian Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanationscited by 51
  2. 2019ALIME: Autoencoder Based Approach for Local Interpretabilitycited by 41
  3. 2020Statistical stability indices for LIME: obtaining reliable explanations for Machine Learning modelscited by 40
  4. 2020OptiLIME: Optimized LIME Explanations for Diagnostic Computer Algorithmscited by 30
  5. 2018Explaining Deep Learning Models - A Bayesian Non-parametric Approachcited by 16
  6. 2017Variable selection for Gaussian processes via sensitivity analysis of the posterior predictive distributioncited by 15
  7. 2020Improving LIME Robustness with Smarter Locality Samplingcited by 12
  8. 2019On Local Optimizers of Acquisition Functions in Bayesian Optimizationcited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

12 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026From Passive Metric to Active Signal: The Evolving Role of Uncertainty Quantification in Large Language Models
  2. 2026Learn More with Less: Uncertainty Consistency Guided Query Selection for RLVR
  3. 2024Towards Modeling Uncertainties of Self-explaining Neural Networks via Conformal Prediction
  4. 2026Mechanistic Interpretability for Neural Networks: Circuits, Sparse Features and Symbolic Reasoning
  5. 2022Towards Benchmarking Explainable Artificial Intelligence Methods
  6. 2025Active inference and artificial reasoning
  7. 2025Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): from inherent explainability to large language models
  8. 2025Explainability of Large Language Models: Opportunities and Challenges toward Generating Trustworthy Explanations