Jasmine: A New Active Learning Approach to Combat Cybercrime
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Over the past decade, the advent of cybercrime has accelarated the research on cybersecurity. However, the deployment of intrusion detection methods falls short. One of the reasons for this is the lack of realistic evaluation datasets, which makes it a challenge to develop techniques and compare them. This is caused by the large amounts of effort it takes for a cyber analyst to classify network connections. This has raised the need for methods (i) that can learn from small sets of labeled data, (ii) that can make predictions on large sets of unlabeled data, and (iii) that request the label of only specially selected unlabeled data instances. Hence, Active Learning (AL) methods are of interest. These approaches choose specific unlabeled instances by a query function that are expected to improve overall classification performance. The resulting query observations are labeled by a human expert and added to the labeled set. In this paper, we propose a new hybrid AL method called Jasmine. Firstly, it determines how suitable each observation is for querying, i.e., how likely it is to enhance classification. These properties are the uncertainty score and anomaly score. Secondly, Jasmine introduces dynamic updating. This allows the model to adjust the balance between querying uncertain, anomalous and randomly selected observations. To this end, Jasmine is able to learn the best query strategy during the labeling process. This is in contrast to the other AL methods in cybersecurity that all have static, predetermined query functions. We show that dynamic updating, and therefore Jasmine, is able to consistently obtain good and more robust results than querying only uncertainties, only anomalies or a fixed combination of the two.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2021.
Builds on
3 of 34 references.
References · 3
- 2015Hyperparameter Search in Machine Learningcited by 33
- 2018Active Learning for Wireless IoT Intrusion Detectioncited by 19
- 2013Machine Learning Techniques for Intrusion Detectioncited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1.
2 papers.