mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A comparison of latent semantic analysis and correspondence analysis of document-term matrices

arXiv 2108.06197 ↗First posted 25 Jul 2021cs.IR cs.CL cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Latent semantic analysis (LSA) and correspondence analysis (CA) are two techniques that use a singular value decomposition (SVD) for dimensionality reduction. LSA has been extensively used to obtain low-dimensional representations that capture relationships among documents and terms. In this article, we present a theoretical analysis and comparison of the two techniques in the context of document-term matrices. We show that CA has some attractive properties as compared to LSA, for instance that effects of margins, i.e. sums of row elements and column elements, arising from differing document-lengths and term-frequencies are effectively eliminated, so that the CA solution is optimally suited to focus on relationships among documents and terms. A unifying framework is proposed that includes both CA and LSA as special cases. We empirically compare CA to various LSA based methods on text categorization in English and authorship attribution on historical Dutch texts, and find that CA performs significantly better. We also apply CA to a long-standing question regarding the authorship of the Dutch national anthem Wilhelmus and provide further support that it can be attributed to the author Datheen, amongst several contenders.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2021.

Builds on

2 of 78 references.

References · 2

  1. 2019Text Mining using Nonnegative Matrix Factorization and Latent Semantic Analysiscited by 5
  2. 2019Effectiveness of Data-Driven Induction of Semantic Spaces and Traditional Classifiers for Sarcasm Detectioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.