mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DiagViB-6: A Diagnostic Benchmark Suite for Vision Models in the Presence of Shortcut and Generalization Opportunities

arXiv 2108.05779 ↗First posted 12 Aug 2021cs.CVcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Common deep neural networks (DNNs) for image classification have been shown to rely on shortcut opportunities (SO) in the form of predictive and easy-to-represent visual factors. This is known as shortcut learning and leads to impaired generalization. In this work, we show that common DNNs also suffer from shortcut learning when predicting only basic visual object factors of variation (FoV) such as shape, color, or texture. We argue that besides shortcut opportunities, generalization opportunities (GO) are also an inherent part of real-world vision data and arise from partial independence between predicted classes and FoVs. We also argue that it is necessary for DNNs to exploit GO to overcome shortcut learning. Our core contribution is to introduce the Diagnostic Vision Benchmark suite DiagViB-6, which includes datasets and metrics to study a network's shortcut vulnerability and generalization capability for six independent FoV. In particular, DiagViB-6 allows controlling the type and degree of SO and GO in a dataset. We benchmark a wide range of popular vision architectures and show that they can exploit GO only to a limited extent.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2021.

Builds on

23 of 36 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  4. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  5. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  6. 2020Shortcut Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 1,928
  7. 2016CLEVR: A Diagnostic Dataset for Compositional Language and Elementary Visual Reasoningcited by 1,445
  8. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
  9. 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 929
  10. 2018Recognition in Terra Incognitacited by 655
  11. 2018Disentangling by Factorisingcited by 614
  12. 2018Rethinking ImageNet Pre-trainingcited by 376
11 more
  1. 2020Unsupervised Discovery of Interpretable Directions in the GAN Latent Spacecited by 288
  2. 2017DARLA: Improving Zero-Shot Transfer in Reinforcement Learningcited by 147
  3. 2020What shapes feature representations? Exploring datasets, architectures, and trainingcited by 125
  4. 2021Counterfactual Generative Networkscited by 111
  5. 2020The Hessian Penalty: A Weak Prior for Unsupervised Disentanglementcited by 90
  6. 2020Symmetry and Group in Attribute-Object Compositionscited by 89
  7. 2020A causal view of compositional zero-shot recognitioncited by 78
  8. 2020Shape-Texture Debiased Neural Network Trainingcited by 76
  9. 2020Automatic Shortcut Removal for Self-Supervised Representation Learningcited by 43
  10. 2019LaSO: Label-Set Operations networks for multi-label few-shot learningcited by 38
  11. 2020A Study of Compositional Generalization in Neural Modelscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 5; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

10 papers.