mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bayesian Deep Learning for Partial Differential Equation Parameter Discovery with Sparse and Noisy Data

arXiv 2108.04085 ↗First posted 5 Aug 2021math.NA cs.LG cs.NAcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Scientific machine learning has been successfully applied to inverse problems and PDE discovery in computational physics. One caveat concerning current methods is the need for large amounts of ("clean") data, in order to characterize the full system response and discover underlying physical models. Bayesian methods may be particularly promising for overcoming these challenges, as they are naturally less sensitive to the negative effects of sparse and noisy data. In this paper, we propose to use Bayesian neural networks (BNN) in order to: 1) Recover the full system states from measurement data (e.g. temperature, velocity field, etc.). We use Hamiltonian Monte-Carlo to sample the posterior distribution of a deep and dense BNN, and show that it is possible to accurately capture physics of varying complexity, without overfitting. 2) Recover the parameters instantiating the underlying partial differential equation (PDE) governing the physical system. Using the trained BNN, as a surrogate of the system response, we generate datasets of derivatives that are potentially comprising the latent PDE governing the observed system and then perform a sequential threshold Bayesian linear regression (STBLR), between the successive derivatives in space and time, to recover the original PDE parameters. We take advantage of the confidence intervals within the BNN outputs, and introduce the spatial derivatives cumulative variance into the STBLR likelihood, to mitigate the influence of highly uncertain derivative data points; thus allowing for more accurate parameter discovery. We demonstrate our approach on a handful of example, in applied physics and non-linear dynamics.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2021.

Builds on

16 of 37 references.

References · 16

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,466
  4. 2017Deep learning for universal linear embeddings of nonlinear dynamicscited by 491
  5. 2020Hands-on Bayesian Neural Networks -- a Tutorial for Deep Learning Userscited by 336
  6. 2020B-PINNs: Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Noisy Datacited by 329
  7. 2018Deep Hidden Physics Models: Deep Learning of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 233
  8. 2017Hidden Physics Models: Machine Learning of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 208
  9. 2017A Conceptual Introduction to Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 207
  10. 2017Machine Learning of Linear Differential Equations using Gaussian Processescited by 139
  11. 2020Bayesian Neural Networks: An Introduction and Surveycited by 130
  12. 2019DeepMoD: Deep learning for Model Discovery in noisy datacited by 70
4 more
  1. 2020Multi-fidelity Bayesian Neural Networks: Algorithms and Applicationscited by 59
  2. 2020Scaling Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Inference for Bayesian Neural Networks with Symmetric Splittingcited by 54
  3. 2019DL-PDE: Deep-learning based data-driven discovery of partial differential equations from discrete and noisy datacited by 38
  4. 2020Deep-learning based discovery of partial differential equations in integral form from sparse and noisy datacited by 14

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 6; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

12 papers.