mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Zero-shot Language Modeling

arXiv 2108.03334 ↗First posted 6 Aug 2021cs.CLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Can we construct a neural model that is inductively biased towards learning human languages? Motivated by this question, we aim at constructing an informative prior over neural weights, in order to adapt quickly to held-out languages in the task of character-level language modeling. We infer this distribution from a sample of typologically diverse training languages via Laplace approximation. The use of such a prior outperforms baseline models with an uninformative prior (so-called "fine-tuning") in both zero-shot and few-shot settings. This shows that the prior is imbued with universal phonological knowledge. Moreover, we harness additional language-specific side information as distant supervision for held-out languages. Specifically, we condition language models on features from typological databases, by concatenating them to hidden states or generating weights with hyper-networks. These features appear beneficial in the few-shot setting, but not in the zero-shot setting. Since the paucity of digital texts affects the majority of the world's languages, we hope that these findings will help broaden the scope of applications for language technology.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2021.

Builds on

27 of 59 references.

References · 27

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
  3. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
  4. 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,246
  5. 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 952
  6. 2017An Overview of Multi-Task Learning in Deep Neural Networkscited by 791
  7. 2013Generating Sequences With Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 549
  8. 2016Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependenciescited by 350
  9. 2018Targeted Syntactic Evaluation of Language Modelscited by 239
  10. 2017Regularizing and Optimizing LSTM Language Modelscited by 205
  11. 2018Online Structured Laplace Approximations For Overcoming Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 197
  12. 2019To Tune or Not to Tune? Adapting Pretrained Representations to Diverse Taskscited by 167
15 more
  1. 2015A Theoretically Grounded Application of Dropout in Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 161
  2. 2013Revisiting Natural Gradient for Deep Networkscited by 157
  3. 2018Modeling Language Variation and Universals: A Survey on Typological Linguistics for Natural Language Processingcited by 63
  4. 2018Are All Languages Equally Hard to Language-Model?cited by 53
  5. 2019What Kind of Language Is Hard to Language-Model?cited by 50
  6. 2018Contextual Parameter Generation for Universal Neural Machine Translationcited by 40
  7. 2017Unbiasing Truncated Backpropagation Through Timecited by 37
  8. 2019Studying the Inductive Biases of RNNs with Synthetic Variations of Natural Languagescited by 37
  9. 2018An Analysis of Neural Language Modeling at Multiple Scalescited by 31
  10. 2016Continuous multilinguality with language vectorscited by 20
  11. 2018Can LSTM Learn to Capture Agreement? The Case of Basquecited by 17
  12. 2018Metalearning with Hebbian Fast Weightscited by 15
  13. 2018Bayesian Incremental Learning for Deep Neural Networkscited by 6
  14. 2013Laplace's Method Approximations for Probabilistic Inference in Belief Networks with Continuous Variablescited by 5
  15. 2016Polyglot Neural Language Models: A Case Study in Cross-Lingual Phonetic Representation Learningcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

3 papers.