Reducing Unintended Bias of ML Models on Tabular and Textual Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Unintended biases in machine learning (ML) models are among the major concerns that must be addressed to maintain public trust in ML. In this paper, we address process fairness of ML models that consists in reducing the dependence of models on sensitive features, without compromising their performance. We revisit the framework FixOut that is inspired in the approach "fairness through unawareness" to build fairer models. We introduce several improvements such as automating the choice of FixOut's parameters. Also, FixOut was originally proposed to improve fairness of ML models on tabular data. We also demonstrate the feasibility of FixOut's workflow for models on textual data. We present several experimental results that illustrate the fact that FixOut improves process fairness on different classification settings.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Aug 2021.
Builds on
15 of 26 references.
References · 15
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
- 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,156
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
- 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 804
- 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 736
- 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 443
- 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 369
- 2019Racial Bias in Hate Speech and Abusive Language Detection Datasetscited by 209
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
6 papers.
- 2023A Critical Survey on Fairness Benefits of Explainable AIcited by 16
- 2022Survey on Fairness Notions and Related Tensionscited by 9
- 2023A statistical approach to detect sensitive features in a group fairness settingcited by 2
- 2025Underrepresentation, Label Bias, and Proxies: Towards Data Bias Profiles for the EU AI Act and Beyondcited by 2
- 2024Fairness Interventions in Classification: A Study on AI Explainabilitycited by 0
- 2026TIMEGATE: Sustainable Time-Boxed Promotion Gates for Continual ML Adaptation Under Resource Constraintscited by 0
- 2026TIMEGATE: Sustainable Time-Boxed Promotion Gates for Continual ML Adaptation Under Resource Constraints27 May 2026
- 2025Underrepresentation, Label Bias, and Proxies: Towards Data Bias Profiles for the EU AI Act and Beyond9 Jul 2025
- 2024Fairness Interventions in Classification: A Study on AI Explainability20 Jul 2024
- 2023A Critical Survey on Fairness Benefits of Explainable AI15 Oct 2023
- 2023A statistical approach to detect sensitive features in a group fairness setting11 May 2023
- 2022Survey on Fairness Notions and Related Tensions16 Sep 2022