Pan-Cancer Integrative Histology-Genomic Analysis via Interpretable Multimodal Deep Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The rapidly emerging field of deep learning-based computational pathology has demonstrated promise in developing objective prognostic models from histology whole slide images. However, most prognostic models are either based on histology or genomics alone and do not address how histology and genomics can be integrated to develop joint image-omic prognostic models. Additionally identifying explainable morphological and molecular descriptors from these models that govern such prognosis is of interest. We used multimodal deep learning to integrate gigapixel whole slide pathology images, RNA-seq abundance, copy number variation, and mutation data from 5,720 patients across 14 major cancer types. Our interpretable, weakly-supervised, multimodal deep learning algorithm is able to fuse these heterogeneous modalities for predicting outcomes and discover prognostic features from these modalities that corroborate with poor and favorable outcomes via multimodal interpretability. We compared our model with unimodal deep learning models trained on histology slides and molecular profiles alone, and demonstrate performance increase in risk stratification on 9 out of 14 cancers. In addition, we analyze morphologic and molecular markers responsible for prognostic predictions across all cancer types. All analyzed data, including morphological and molecular correlates of patient prognosis across the 14 cancer types at a disease and patient level are presented in an interactive open-access database (http://pancancer.mahmoodlab.org) to allow for further exploration and prognostic biomarker discovery. To validate that these model explanations are prognostic, we further analyzed high attention morphological regions in WSIs, which indicates that tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte presence corroborates with favorable cancer prognosis on 9 out of 14 cancer types studied.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2021.
Builds on
17 of 55 references.
References · 17
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
- 2018Attention-based Deep Multiple Instance Learningcited by 1,077
- 2017Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomycited by 1,004
- 2020Data Efficient and Weakly Supervised Computational Pathology on Whole Slide Imagescited by 738
- 2017Self-Normalizing Neural Networkscited by 591
- 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 542
- 2017Tensor Fusion Network for Multimodal Sentiment Analysiscited by 429
- 2018HoVer-Net: Simultaneous Segmentation and Classification of Nuclei in Multi-Tissue Histology Imagescited by 387
- 2019Pathomic Fusion: An Integrated Framework for Fusing Histopathology and Genomic Features for Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosiscited by 165
- 2021Whole Slide Images are 2D Point Clouds: Context-Aware Survival Prediction using Patch-based Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 124
- 2020Deep Learning-based Computational Pathology Predicts Origins for Cancers of Unknown Primarycited by 89
- 2020Federated Learning for Computational Pathology on Gigapixel Whole Slide Imagescited by 54
5 more
- 2019Deep learning-based survival prediction for multiple cancer types using histopathology imagescited by 47
- 2019Semi-Supervised Histology Classification using Deep Multiple Instance Learning and Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 35
- 2019Weakly Supervised Prostate TMA Classification via Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 17
- 2017Bootstrapping the Out-of-sample Predictions for Efficient and Accurate Cross-Validationcited by 12
- 2017Deep learning-based assessment of tumor-associated stroma for diagnosing breast cancer in histopathology imagescited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.