mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Core-Stable Committees under Restricted Domains

arXiv 2108.01987 ↗First posted 4 Aug 2021cs.GT cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the setting of committee elections, where a group of individuals needs to collectively select a given size subset of available objects. This model is relevant for a number of real-life scenarios including political elections, participatory budgeting, and facility-location. We focus on the core -- the classic notion of proportionality, stability and fairness. We show that for a number of restricted domains including voter-interval, candidate-interval, single-peaked, and single-crossing preferences the core is non-empty and can be found in polynomial time. We show that the core might be empty for strict top-monotonic preferences, yet we introduce a relaxation of this class, which guarantees non-emptiness of the core. Our algorithms work both in the randomized and discrete models. We also show that the classic known proportional rules do not return committees from the core even for the most restrictive domains among those we consider (in particular for 1D-Euclidean preferences). We additionally prove a number of structural results that give better insights into the nature of some of the restricted domains, and which in particular give a better intuitive understanding of the class of top-monotonic preferences.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2021.

Builds on

16 of 36 references.

References · 16

  1. 2014Justified Representation in Approval-Based Committee Votingcited by 42
  2. 2016Proportional Justified Representationcited by 25
  3. 2018Fair Allocation of Indivisible Public Goodscited by 22
  4. 2019Proportionality and the Limits of Welfarismcited by 21
  5. 2015Properties of Multiwinner Voting Rulescited by 20
  6. 2016The Core of the Participatory Budgeting Problemcited by 14
  7. 2017Fair mixing: the case of dichotomous preferencescited by 14
  8. 2014Finding a Collective Set of Items: From Proportional Multirepresentation to Group Recommendationcited by 13
  9. 2016Proportional Rankingscited by 10
  10. 2019Group Fairness in Committee Selectioncited by 10
  11. 2019Approval-Based Apportionmentcited by 8
  12. 2015Structure in Dichotomous Preferencescited by 7
4 more
  1. 2019Approximately Stable Committee Selectioncited by 7
  2. 2020A verifiably secure and proportional committee election rulecited by 6
  3. 2017The Condorcet Principle for Multiwinner Elections: From Shortlisting to Proportionalitycited by 4
  4. 2020Overview of Polkadot and its Design Considerationscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

3 papers.