Improving Distinction between ASR Errors and Speech Disfluencies with Feature Space Interpolation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fine-tuning pretrained language models (LMs) is a popular approach to automatic speech recognition (ASR) error detection during post-processing. While error detection systems often take advantage of statistical language archetypes captured by LMs, at times the pretrained knowledge can hinder error detection performance. For instance, presence of speech disfluencies might confuse the post-processing system into tagging disfluent but accurate transcriptions as ASR errors. Such confusion occurs because both error detection and disfluency detection tasks attempt to identify tokens at statistically unlikely positions. This paper proposes a scheme to improve existing LM-based ASR error detection systems, both in terms of detection scores and resilience to such distracting auxiliary tasks. Our approach adopts the popular mixup method in text feature space and can be utilized with any black-box ASR output. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our method, we conduct post-processing experiments with both traditional and end-to-end ASR systems (both for English and Korean languages) with 5 different speech corpora. We find that our method improves both ASR error detection F 1 scores and reduces the number of correctly transcribed disfluencies wrongly detected as ASR errors. Finally, we suggest methods to utilize resulting LMs directly in semi-supervised ASR training.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2021.
Builds on
21 of 39 references.
References · 21
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
- 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,898
- 2020YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detectioncited by 1,624
- 2019MixMatch: A Holistic Approach to Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,390
- 2018Bag of Tricks for Image Classification with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 430
- 2020Improved Noisy Student Training for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 139
- 2018Training Tips for the Transformer Modelcited by 85
- 2020Sequence-Level Mixed Sample Data Augmentationcited by 71
- 2019Correction of Automatic Speech Recognition with Transformer Sequence-to-sequence Modelcited by 52
- 2020SeqMix: Augmenting Active Sequence Labeling via Sequence Mixupcited by 52
- 2020ASR Error Correction and Domain Adaptation Using Machine Translationcited by 48
9 more
- 2020Joint Contextual Modeling for ASR Correction and Language Understandingcited by 30
- 2019Multi-Task Self-Supervised Learning for Disfluency Detectioncited by 20
- 2020Data Augmentation for Training Dialog Models Robust to Speech Recognition Errorscited by 17
- 2020Calibrated Language Model Fine-Tuning for In- and Out-of-Distribution Datacited by 17
- 2020Semi-Supervised Speech Recognition via Local Prior Matchingcited by 13
- 2020Combining Self-Training and Self-Supervised Learning for Unsupervised Disfluency Detectioncited by 10
- 2018Towards Fluent Translations from Disfluent Speechcited by 7
- 2020Auxiliary Sequence Labeling Tasks for Disfluency Detectioncited by 6
- 2017Adapting general-purpose speech recognition engine output for domain-specific natural language question answeringcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.