Geometry-Aware Merge Tree Comparisons for Time-Varying Data with Interleaving Distances
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Merge trees, a type of topological descriptor, serve to identify and summarize the topological characteristics associated with scalar fields. They present a great potential for the analysis and visualization of time-varying data. First, they give compressed and topology-preserving representations of data instances. Second, their comparisons provide a basis for studying the relations among data instances, such as their distributions, clusters, outliers, and periodicities. A number of comparative measures have been developed for merge trees. However, these measures are often computationally expensive since they implicitly consider all possible correspondences between critical points of the merge trees. In this paper, we perform geometry-aware comparisons of merge trees using labeled interleaving distances. The main idea is to decouple the computation of a comparative measure into two steps: a labeling step that generates a correspondence between the critical points of two merge trees, and a comparison step that computes distances between a pair of labeled merge trees by encoding them as matrices. We show that our approach is general, computationally efficient, and practically useful. Our general framework makes it possible to integrate geometric information of the data domain in the labeling process. At the same time, it reduces the computational complexity since not all possible correspondences have to be considered. We demonstrate via experiments that such geometry-aware merge tree comparisons help to detect transitions, clusters, and periodicities of time-varying datasets, as well as to diagnose and highlight the topological changes between adjacent data instances.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2024Rapid and Precise Topological Comparison with Merge Tree Neural Networkscited by 2
- 2025Local-Order Auxiliary Losses Can Improve Autoencoder Reconstructioncited by 0
- 2026MS-COOT: Comparing Morse-Smale Complexes with Co-Optimal Transportcited by 0
- 2026Direct Topology Tracking in Continuous Implicit Modelscited by 0
- 2026Direct Topology Tracking in Continuous Implicit Models10 Sep 2026
- 2026MS-COOT: Comparing Morse-Smale Complexes with Co-Optimal Transport6 Jun 2026
- 2025Local-Order Auxiliary Losses Can Improve Autoencoder Reconstruction5 Apr 2025
- 2024Rapid and Precise Topological Comparison with Merge Tree Neural Networks8 Apr 2024