RiLACS: Risk-Limiting Audits via Confidence Sequences
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Accurately determining the outcome of an election is a complex task with many potential sources of error, ranging from software glitches in voting machines to procedural lapses to outright fraud. Risk-limiting audits (RLA) are statistically principled "incremental" hand counts that provide statistical assurance that reported outcomes accurately reflect the validly cast votes. We present a suite of tools for conducting RLAs using confidence sequences -- sequences of confidence sets which uniformly capture an electoral parameter of interest from the start of an audit to the point of an exhaustive recount with high probability. Adopting the SHANGRLA framework, we design nonnegative martingales which yield computationally and statistically efficient confidence sequences and RLAs for a wide variety of election types.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2023Auditing Fairness by Bettingcited by 24
- 2025Probably Approximately Correct Labelscited by 7
- 2023Risk-limiting Financial Audits via Weighted Sampling without Replacementcited by 6
- 2025Sequentially Auditing Differential Privacycited by 5
- 2026Optimal Rates for Differentially Private Hypothesis Testing with E-valuescited by 1
- 2026Sequential Audit Sampling for Finite Populations with Exact and Simulation-based Guaranteecited by 0
- 2026Optimal Rates for Differentially Private Hypothesis Testing with E-values27 May 2026
- 2026Sequential Audit Sampling for Finite Populations with Exact and Simulation-based Guarantee7 Apr 2026
- 2025Sequentially Auditing Differential Privacy8 Sep 2025
- 2025Probably Approximately Correct Labels12 Jun 2025
- 2023Auditing Fairness by Betting27 May 2023
- 2023Risk-limiting Financial Audits via Weighted Sampling without Replacement8 May 2023