mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

An Empirical Study on Code Comment Completion

arXiv 2107.10544 ↗First posted 22 Jul 2021cs.SEcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Code comments play a prominent role in program comprehension activities. However, source code is not always documented and code and comments not always co-evolve. To deal with these issues, researchers have proposed techniques to automatically generate comments documenting a given code at hand. The most recent works in the area applied deep learning (DL) techniques to support such a task. Despite the achieved advances, the empirical evaluations of these approaches show that they are still far from a performance level that would make them valuable for developers. We tackle a simpler and related problem: Code comment completion. Instead of generating a comment for a given code from scratch, we investigate the extent to which state-of-the-art techniques can help developers in writing comments faster. We present a large-scale study in which we empirically assess how a simple n-gram model and the recently proposed Text-To-Text Transfer Transformer (T5) architecture can perform in autocompleting a code comment the developer is typing. The achieved results show the superiority of the T5 model, despite the n-gram model being a competitive solution.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

5 papers.