mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Statistical Model of Word Rank Evolution

arXiv 2107.09948 ↗First posted 21 Jul 2021cs.CL stat.APcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The availability of large linguistic data sets enables data-driven approaches to study linguistic change. The Google Books corpus unigram frequency data set is used to investigate the word rank dynamics in eight languages. We observed the rank changes of the unigrams from 1900 to 2008 and compared it to a Wright-Fisher inspired model that we developed for our analysis. The model simulates a neutral evolutionary process with the restriction of having no disappearing and added words. This work explains the mathematical framework of the model - written as a Markov Chain with multinomial transition probabilities - to show how frequencies of words change in time. From our observations in the data and our model, word rank stability shows two types of characteristics: (1) the increase/decrease in ranks are monotonic, or (2) the rank stays the same. Based on our model, high-ranked words tend to be more stable while low-ranked words tend to be more volatile. Some words change in ranks in two ways: (a) by an accumulation of small increasing/decreasing rank changes in time and (b) by shocks of increase/decrease in ranks. Most words in all of the languages we have looked at are rank stable, but not as stable as a neutral model would predict. The stopwords and Swadesh words are observed to be rank stable across eight languages indicating linguistic conformity in established languages. These signatures suggest unigram frequencies in all languages have changed in a manner inconsistent with a purely neutral evolutionary process.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2021.

Builds on

10 of 76 references.

References · 10

  1. 2016Diachronic Word Embeddings Reveal Statistical Laws of Semantic Changecited by 219
  2. 2014Statistically Significant Detection of Linguistic Changecited by 82
  3. 2018A standardized Project Gutenberg corpus for statistical analysis of natural language and quantitative linguisticscited by 64
  4. 2014Temporal Analysis of Language through Neural Language Modelscited by 53
  5. 2017Dynamic Word Embeddingscited by 51
  6. 2014Human language reveals a universal positivity biascited by 23
  7. 2015Characterizing the Google Books corpus: Strong limits to inferences of socio-cultural and linguistic evolutioncited by 15
  8. 2016Evolutionary forces in language changecited by 10
  9. 2019The Natural Selection of Words: Finding the Features of Fitnesscited by 4
  10. 2015Rank diversity of languages: Generic behavior in computational linguisticscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.