Explainable AI Enabled Inspection of Business Process Prediction Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern data analytics underpinned by machine learning techniques has become a key enabler to the automation of data-led decision making. As an important branch of state-of-the-art data analytics, business process predictions are also faced with a challenge in regard to the lack of explanation to the reasoning and decision by the underlying `black-box' prediction models. With the development of interpretable machine learning techniques, explanations can be generated for a black-box model, making it possible for (human) users to access the reasoning behind machine learned predictions. In this paper, we aim to present an approach that allows us to use model explanations to investigate certain reasoning applied by machine learned predictions and detect potential issues with the underlying methods thus enhancing trust in business process prediction models. A novel contribution of our approach is the proposal of model inspection that leverages both the explanations generated by interpretable machine learning mechanisms and the contextual or domain knowledge extracted from event logs that record historical process execution. Findings drawn from this work are expected to serve as a key input to developing model reliability metrics and evaluation in the context of business process predictions.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2021.
Builds on
5 of 15 references.
References · 5
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
- 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
- 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 716
- 2018Survey and cross-benchmark comparison of remaining time prediction methods in business process monitoringcited by 43
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2.
2 papers.