Understanding Gender and Racial Disparities in Image Recognition Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large scale image classification models trained on top of popular datasets such as Imagenet have shown to have a distributional skew which leads to disparities in prediction accuracies across different subsections of population demographics. A lot of approaches have been made to solve for this distributional skew using methods that alter the model pre, post and during training. We investigate one such approach - which uses a multi-label softmax loss with cross-entropy as the loss function instead of a binary cross-entropy on a multi-label classification problem on the Inclusive Images dataset which is a subset of the OpenImages V6 dataset. We use the MR2 dataset, which contains images of people with self-identified gender and race attributes to evaluate the fairness in the model outcomes and try to interpret the mistakes by looking at model activations and suggest possible fixes.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2021.
Builds on
7 of 16 references.
References · 7
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,789
- 2019Transfusion: Understanding Transfer Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 368
- 2017No Classification without Representation: Assessing Geodiversity Issues in Open Data Sets for the Developing Worldcited by 153
- 2018Why Is My Classifier Discriminatory?cited by 143
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
2 papers.