Communicating via Markov Decision Processes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the problem of communicating exogenous information by means of Markov decision process trajectories. This setting, which we call a Markov coding game (MCG), generalizes both source coding and a large class of referential games. MCGs also isolate a problem that is important in decentralized control settings in which cheap-talk is not available -- namely, they require balancing communication with the associated cost of communicating. We contribute a theoretically grounded approach to MCGs based on maximum entropy reinforcement learning and minimum entropy coupling that we call MEME. Due to recent breakthroughs in approximation algorithms for minimum entropy coupling, MEME is not merely a theoretical algorithm, but can be applied to practical settings. Empirically, we show both that MEME is able to outperform a strong baseline on small MCGs and that MEME is able to achieve strong performance on extremely large MCGs. To the latter point, we demonstrate that MEME is able to losslessly communicate binary images via trajectories of Cartpole and Pong, while simultaneously achieving the maximal or near maximal expected returns, and that it is even capable of performing well in the presence of actuator noise.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jul 2021.
Builds on
10 of 34 references.
References · 10
- 2018Diversity is All You Need: Learning Skills without a Reward Functioncited by 734
- 2016Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 561
- 2016Learning Multiagent Communication with Backpropagationcited by 355
- 2018TarMAC: Targeted Multi-Agent Communicationcited by 201
- 2018Emergence of Linguistic Communication from Referential Games with Symbolic and Pixel Inputcited by 102
- 2019Learning Efficient Multi-agent Communication: An Information Bottleneck Approachcited by 60
- 2019Learning Agent Communication under Limited Bandwidth by Message Pruningcited by 31
- 2018Learning to Share and Hide Intentions using Information Regularizationcited by 13
- 2019Minimum--Entropy Couplings and their Applicationscited by 7
- 2021Inference-Based Deterministic Messaging For Multi-Agent Communicationcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2024Secret Collusion among AI Agents: Multi-Agent Deception via Steganographycited by 107
- 2024Hidden in Plain Text: Emergence & Mitigation of Steganographic Collusion in LLMscited by 52
- 2022Perfectly Secure Steganography Using Minimum Entropy Couplingcited by 42
- 2024Minimum Entropy Coupling with Bottleneckcited by 5
- 2023Cheap Talk Discovery and Utilization in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 4
- 2023On the Role of Emergent Communication for Social Learning in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
- 2025Learning to Match Unpaired Data with Minimum Entropy Couplingcited by 2
- 2026Despite Instructions: Frontier Agents Improvise Covert Channels at Test Timecited by 1
- 2026Breaking the Finite-Sample Barrier in Entropy Couplingcited by 0
- 2026Despite Instructions: Frontier Agents Improvise Covert Channels at Test Time26 Sep 2026
- 2026Breaking the Finite-Sample Barrier in Entropy Coupling15 May 2026
- 2025Learning to Match Unpaired Data with Minimum Entropy Coupling11 Mar 2025
- 2024Minimum Entropy Coupling with Bottleneck29 Oct 2024
- 2024Hidden in Plain Text: Emergence & Mitigation of Steganographic Collusion in LLMs2 Oct 2024
- 2024Secret Collusion among AI Agents: Multi-Agent Deception via Steganography12 Feb 2024
- 2023Cheap Talk Discovery and Utilization in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning19 Mar 2023
- 2023On the Role of Emergent Communication for Social Learning in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning28 Feb 2023
- 2022Perfectly Secure Steganography Using Minimum Entropy Coupling24 Oct 2022