Tournesol: A quest for a large, secure and trustworthy database of reliable human judgments
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Today's large-scale algorithms have become immensely influential, as they recommend and moderate the content that billions of humans are exposed to on a daily basis. They are the de-facto regulators of our societies' information diet, from shaping opinions on public health to organizing groups for social movements. This creates serious concerns, but also great opportunities to promote quality information. Addressing the concerns and seizing the opportunities is a challenging, enormous and fabulous endeavor, as intuitively appealing ideas often come with unwanted it side effects, and as it requires us to think about what we deeply prefer. Understanding how today's large-scale algorithms are built is critical to determine what interventions will be most effective. Given that these algorithms rely heavily on it machine learning, we make the following key observation: any algorithm trained on uncontrolled data must not be trusted. Indeed, a malicious entity could take control over the data, poison it with dangerously manipulative fabricated inputs, and thereby make the trained algorithm extremely unsafe. We thus argue that the first step towards safe and ethical large-scale algorithms must be the collection of a large, secure and trustworthy dataset of reliable human judgments. To achieve this, we introduce Tournesol, an open source platform available at urlhttps://tournesol.app. Tournesol aims to collect a large database of human judgments on what algorithms ought to widely recommend (and what they ought to stop widely recommending). We outline the structure of the Tournesol database, the key features of the Tournesol platform and the main hurdles that must be overcome to make it a successful project. Most importantly, we argue that, if successful, Tournesol may then serve as the essential foundation for any safe and ethical large-scale algorithm.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 94 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2021.
Builds on
11 of 94 references.
References · 11
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,014
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
- 2021Persistent Anti-Muslim Bias in Large Language Modelscited by 376
- 2018The Hidden Vulnerability of Distributed Learning in Byzantiumcited by 324
- 2018The Design and Implementation of XiaoIce, an Empathetic Social Chatbotcited by 172
- 2020The Radicalization Risks of GPT-3 and Advanced Neural Language Modelscited by 76
- 2019Auditing Radicalization Pathways on YouTubecited by 52
- 2020Distributed Momentum for Byzantine-resilient Learningcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.
11 papers.
- 2022On the Impossible Safety of Large AI Modelscited by 27
- 2024Inverting Gradient Attacks Makes Powerful Data Poisoningcited by 2
- 2025On the Byzantine Fault Tolerance of signSGD with Majority Votecited by 2
- 2026With a Little Help From My Friends: Collective Manipulation in Risk-Controlling Recommender Systemscited by 2
- 2021Strategyproof Learning: Building Trustworthy User-Generated Datasetscited by 1
- 2022Identify ambiguous tasks combining crowdsourced labels by weighting Areas Under the Margincited by 1
- 2025Generalizing while preserving monotonicity in comparison-based preference learning modelscited by 1
- 2026Byzantine Machine Learning: MultiKrum and an optimal notion of robustnesscited by 1
- 2025Approaching the Harm of Gradient Attacks While Only Flipping Labelscited by 0
- 2025A Case for Specialisation in Non-Human Entitiescited by 0
- 2025On Monotonicity in AI Alignmentcited by 0
- 2026With a Little Help From My Friends: Collective Manipulation in Risk-Controlling Recommender Systems30 Mar 2026
- 2026Byzantine Machine Learning: MultiKrum and an optimal notion of robustness3 Feb 2026
- 2025On Monotonicity in AI Alignment10 Jun 2025
- 2025Generalizing while preserving monotonicity in comparison-based preference learning models10 Jun 2025
- 2025Approaching the Harm of Gradient Attacks While Only Flipping Labels28 Feb 2025
- 2025On the Byzantine Fault Tolerance of signSGD with Majority Vote26 Feb 2025
- 2025A Case for Specialisation in Non-Human Entities5 Feb 2025
- 2024Inverting Gradient Attacks Makes Powerful Data Poisoning28 Oct 2024
- 2022Identify ambiguous tasks combining crowdsourced labels by weighting Areas Under the Margin30 Sep 2022
- 2022On the Impossible Safety of Large AI Models30 Sep 2022
- 2021Strategyproof Learning: Building Trustworthy User-Generated Datasets4 Jun 2021