mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Model-Parallel Model Selection for Deep Learning Systems

arXiv 2107.06469 ↗First posted 14 Jul 2021cs.DC cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As deep learning becomes more expensive, both in terms of time and compute, inefficiencies in machine learning (ML) training prevent practical usage of state-of-the-art models for most users. The newest model architectures are simply too large to be fit onto a single processor. To address the issue, many ML practitioners have turned to model parallelism as a method of distributing the computational requirements across several devices. Unfortunately, the sequential nature of neural networks causes very low efficiency and device utilization in model parallel training jobs. We propose a new form of "shard parallelism" combining task and model parallelism, then package it into a framework we name Hydra. Hydra recasts the problem of model parallelism in the multi-model context to produce a fine-grained parallel workload of independent model shards, rather than independent models. This new parallel design promises dramatic speedups relative to the traditional model parallelism paradigm.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2021.

Builds on

5 of 11 references.

References · 5

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  3. 2018Tune: A Research Platform for Distributed Model Selection and Trainingcited by 395
  4. 2018Beyond Data and Model Parallelism for Deep Neural Networkscited by 177
  5. 2017Integrated Model, Batch and Domain Parallelism in Training Neural Networkscited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 4; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

6 papers.