Cautious Policy Programming: Exploiting KL Regularization in Monotonic Policy Improvement for Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we propose cautious policy programming (CPP), a novel value-based reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm that can ensure monotonic policy improvement during learning. Based on the nature of entropy-regularized RL, we derive a new entropy regularization-aware lower bound of policy improvement that only requires estimating the expected policy advantage function. CPP leverages this lower bound as a criterion for adjusting the degree of a policy update for alleviating policy oscillation. Different from similar algorithms that are mostly theory-oriented, we also propose a novel interpolation scheme that makes CPP better scale in high dimensional control problems. We demonstrate that the proposed algorithm can trade o? performance and stability in both didactic classic control problems and challenging high-dimensional Atari games.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2021.
Builds on
30 of 70 references.
References · 30
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,093
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,592
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,656
- 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,513
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,488
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,472
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,310
- 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,223
- 2019Solving Rubik's Cube with a Robot Handcited by 702
- 2017Reinforcement Learning with Deep Energy-Based Policiescited by 660
- 2019A Theory of Regularized Markov Decision Processescited by 281
- 2017Noisy Networks for Explorationcited by 264
18 more
- 2020On the Global Convergence Rates of Softmax Policy Gradient Methodscited by 260
- 2020Implementation Matters in Deep Policy Gradients: A Case Study on PPO and TRPOcited by 185
- 2017Bridging the Gap Between Value and Policy Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 178
- 2017A unified view of entropy-regularized Markov decision processescited by 177
- 2019On the Theory of Policy Gradient Methods: Optimality, Approximation, and Distribution Shiftcited by 174
- 2018Understanding the impact of entropy on policy optimizationcited by 172
- 2020Fast Global Convergence of Natural Policy Gradient Methods with Entropy Regularizationcited by 171
- 2015Taming the Noise in Reinforcement Learning via Soft Updatescited by 125
- 2019Adaptive Trust Region Policy Optimization: Global Convergence and Faster Rates for Regularized MDPscited by 116
- 2019Diagnosing Bottlenecks in Deep Q-learning Algorithmscited by 73
- 2020Munchausen Reinforcement Learningcited by 68
- 2020Leverage the Average: an Analysis of KL Regularization in RLcited by 33
- 2017Trust-PCL: An Off-Policy Trust Region Method for Continuous Controlcited by 29
- 2019Momentum in Reinforcement Learningcited by 19
- 2020Batch Stationary Distribution Estimationcited by 19
- 2019Deep Conservative Policy Iterationcited by 15
- 2018Configurable Markov Decision Processescited by 9
- 2020Forward and inverse reinforcement learning sharing network weights and hyperparameterscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.