Identifying Hijacked Reviews
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fake reviews and review manipulation are growing problems on online marketplaces globally. Review Hijacking is a new review manipulation tactic in which unethical sellers "hijack" an existing product page (usually one with many positive reviews), then update the product details like title, photo, and description with those of an entirely different product. With the earlier reviews still attached, the new item appears well-reviewed. However, there are no public datasets of review hijacking and little is known in the literature about this tactic. Hence, this paper proposes a three-part study: (i) we propose a framework to generate synthetically labeled data for review hijacking by swapping products and reviews; (ii) then, we evaluate the potential of both a Twin LSTM network and BERT sequence pair classifier to distinguish legitimate reviews from hijacked ones using this data; and (iii) we then deploy the best performing model on a collection of 31K products (with 6.5 M reviews) in the original data, where we find 100s of previously unknown examples of review hijacking.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2021.
Builds on
4 of 22 references.
References · 4
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2018A Retrospective Analysis of the Fake News Challenge Stance Detection Taskcited by 49
- 2018Neural Sentence Embedding using Only In-domain Sentences for Out-of-domain Sentence Detection in Dialog Systemscited by 18
- 2016Sentence Similarity Measures for Fine-Grained Estimation of Topical Relevance in Learner Essayscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.