A Decision Support System for Safer Airplane Landings: Predicting Runway Conditions Using XGBoost and Explainable AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The presence of snow and ice on runway surfaces reduces the available tire-pavement friction needed for retardation and directional control and causes potential economic and safety threats for the aviation industry during the winter seasons. To activate appropriate safety procedures, pilots need accurate and timely information on the actual runway surface conditions. In this study, XGBoost is used to create a combined runway assessment system, which includes a classification model to identify slippery conditions and a regression model to predict the level of slipperiness. The models are trained on weather data and runway reports. The runway surface conditions are represented by the tire-pavement friction coefficient, which is estimated from flight sensor data from landing aircrafts. The XGBoost models are combined with SHAP approximations to provide a reliable decision support system for airport operators, which can contribute to safer and more economic operations of airport runways. To evaluate the performance of the prediction models, they are compared to several state-of-the-art runway assessment methods. The XGBoost models identify slippery runway conditions with a ROC AUC of 0.95, predict the friction coefficient with a MAE of 0.0254, and outperforms all the previous methods. The results show the strong abilities of machine learning methods to model complex, physical phenomena with a good accuracy. Published version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2022.103556.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2021.
Builds on
8 of 67 references.
References · 8
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
- 2018Consistent Individualized Feature Attribution for Tree Ensemblescited by 279
- 2019Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley valuescited by 205
- 2019Feature relevance quantification in explainable AI: A causal problemcited by 164
- 2020True to the Model or True to the Data?cited by 123
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2023Delay-SDE-net: A deep learning approach for time series modelling with memory and uncertainty estimatescited by 2
- 2022A copula-based boosting model for time-to-event prediction with dependent censoringcited by 1
- 2026Can Large Language Models Explain Flight Safety Events? A Prior-Guided Semantic LLM-based Approachcited by 0
- 2026Can Large Language Models Explain Flight Safety Events? A Prior-Guided Semantic LLM-based Approach18 Aug 2026
- 2023Delay-SDE-net: A deep learning approach for time series modelling with memory and uncertainty estimates14 Mar 2023
- 2022A copula-based boosting model for time-to-event prediction with dependent censoring10 Oct 2022