mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Handling Heavily Abbreviated Manuscripts: HTR engines vs text normalisation approaches

arXiv 2107.03450 ↗First posted 7 Jul 2021cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Although abbreviations are fairly common in handwritten sources, particularly in medieval and modern Western manuscripts, previous research dealing with computational approaches to their expansion is scarce. Yet abbreviations present particular challenges to computational approaches such as handwritten text recognition and natural language processing tasks. Often, pre-processing ultimately aims to lead from a digitised image of the source to a normalised text, which includes expansion of the abbreviations. We explore different setups to obtain such a normalised text, either directly, by training HTR engines on normalised (i.e., expanded, disabbreviated) text, or by decomposing the process into discrete steps, each making use of specialist models for recognition, word segmentation and normalisation. The case studies considered here are drawn from the medieval Latin tradition.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2021.

Builds on

4 of 26 references.

References · 4

  1. 2019A Large-Scale Comparison of Historical Text Normalization Systemscited by 25
  2. 2019Improving Lemmatization of Non-Standard Languages with Joint Learningcited by 12
  3. 2017Important New Developments in Arabographic Optical Character Recognition (OCR)cited by 6
  4. 2020Stylometry for Noisy Medieval Data: Evaluating Paul Meyer's Hagiographic Hypothesiscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.