Linear-time calculation of the expected sum of edge lengths in random projective linearizations of trees
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The syntactic structure of a sentence is often represented using syntactic dependency trees. The sum of the distances between syntactically related words has been in the limelight for the past decades. Research on dependency distances led to the formulation of the principle of dependency distance minimization whereby words in sentences are ordered so as to minimize that sum. Numerous random baselines have been defined to carry out related quantitative studies on languages. The simplest random baseline is the expected value of the sum in unconstrained random permutations of the words in the sentence, namely when all the shufflings of the words of a sentence are allowed and equally likely. Here we focus on a popular baseline: random projective permutations of the words of the sentence, that is, permutations where the syntactic dependency structure is projective, a formal constraint that sentences satisfy often in languages. Thus far, the expectation of the sum of dependency distances in random projective shufflings of a sentence has been estimated approximately with a Monte Carlo procedure whose cost is of the order of Rn, where n is the number of words of the sentence and R is the number of samples; it is well known that the larger R, the lower the error of the estimation but the larger the time cost. Here we present formulae to compute that expectation without error in time of the order of n. Furthermore, we show that star trees maximize it, and give an algorithm to retrieve the trees that minimize it.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2021.
Builds on
4 of 46 references.
References · 4
- 2020The optimality of syntactic dependency distancescited by 15
- 2021Minimum projective linearizations of trees in linear timecited by 9
- 2013Hubiness, length, crossings and their relationships in dependency treescited by 4
- 2014Non-crossing dependencies: least effort, not grammarcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2021The Linear Arrangement Library. A new tool for research on syntactic dependency structurescited by 5
- 2022The expected sum of edge lengths in planar linearizations of trees. Theory and applicationscited by 2
- 2025Who is the root in a syntactic dependency structure?cited by 1
- 2026How to measure the optimality of word or gesture order with respect to the principle of swap distance minimizationcited by 1
- 2022The Maximum Linear Arrangement Problem for trees under projectivity and planaritycited by 0
- 2026How to measure the optimality of word or gesture order with respect to the principle of swap distance minimization2 Apr 2026
- 2025Who is the root in a syntactic dependency structure?25 Jan 2025
- 2022The expected sum of edge lengths in planar linearizations of trees. Theory and applications12 Jul 2022
- 2022The Maximum Linear Arrangement Problem for trees under projectivity and planarity14 Jun 2022
- 2021The Linear Arrangement Library. A new tool for research on syntactic dependency structures5 Dec 2021