Evaluating subgroup disparity using epistemic uncertainty in mammography
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As machine learning (ML) continue to be integrated into healthcare systems that affect clinical decision making, new strategies will need to be incorporated in order to effectively detect and evaluate subgroup disparities to ensure accountability and generalizability in clinical workflows. In this paper, we explore how epistemic uncertainty can be used to evaluate disparity in patient demographics (race) and data acquisition (scanner) subgroups for breast density assessment on a dataset of 108,190 mammograms collected from 33 clinical sites. Our results show that even if aggregate performance is comparable, the choice of uncertainty quantification metric can significantly the subgroup level. We hope this analysis can promote further work on how uncertainty can be leveraged to increase transparency of machine learning applications for clinical deployment.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2021.
Builds on
14 of 26 references.
References · 14
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
- 2015The Variational Fair Autoencodercited by 223
- 2020CheXclusion: Fairness gaps in deep chest X-ray classifierscited by 153
- 2020Uncertainty as a Form of Transparency: Measuring, Communicating, and Using Uncertaintycited by 128
- 2019Fairness in Deep Learning: A Computational Perspectivecited by 123
2 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
6 papers.
- 2021Fair Conformal Predictors for Applications in Medical Imagingcited by 74
- 2022Addressing Fairness Issues in Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Analysis: A Systematic Reviewcited by 27
- 2023FairAdaBN: Mitigating unfairness with adaptive batch normalization and its application to dermatological disease classificationcited by 18
- 2024Biasing & Debiasing based Approach Towards Fair Knowledge Transfer for Equitable Skin Analysiscited by 2
- 2021Deploying clinical machine learning? Consider the following...cited by 1
- 2022Fair Machine Learning in Healthcare: A Reviewcited by 0
- 2024Biasing & Debiasing based Approach Towards Fair Knowledge Transfer for Equitable Skin Analysis16 May 2024
- 2023FairAdaBN: Mitigating unfairness with adaptive batch normalization and its application to dermatological disease classification15 Mar 2023
- 2022Addressing Fairness Issues in Deep Learning-Based Medical Image Analysis: A Systematic Review27 Sep 2022
- 2022Fair Machine Learning in Healthcare: A Review29 Jun 2022
- 2021Deploying clinical machine learning? Consider the following...14 Sep 2021
- 2021Fair Conformal Predictors for Applications in Medical Imaging9 Sep 2021