Calibrating generalized predictive distributions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In prediction problems, it is common to model the data-generating process and then use a model-based procedure, such as a Bayesian predictive distribution, to quantify uncertainty about the next observation. However, if the posited model is misspecified, then its predictions may not be calibrated -- that is, the predictive distribution's quantiles may not be nominal frequentist prediction upper limits, even asymptotically. Rather than abandoning the comfort of a model-based formulation for a more complicated non-model-based approach, here we propose a strategy in which the data itself helps determine if the assumed model-based solution should be adjusted to account for model misspecification. This is achieved through a generalized Bayes formulation where a learning rate parameter is tuned, via the proposed generalized predictive calibration (GPrC) algorithm, to make the predictive distribution calibrated, even under model misspecification. Extensive numerical experiments are presented, under a variety of settings, demonstrating the proposed GPrC algorithm's validity, efficiency, and robustness.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Jul 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2022Scalable Semi-Modular Inference with Variational Meta-Posteriorscited by 2
- 2024Temperature Optimization for Bayesian Deep Learningcited by 1
- 2026Maximin Robust Bayesian Experimental Designcited by 0
- 2026Maximin Robust Bayesian Experimental Design14 Mar 2026
- 2024Temperature Optimization for Bayesian Deep Learning8 Oct 2024
- 2022Scalable Semi-Modular Inference with Variational Meta-Posteriors1 Apr 2022