mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Misinformation Detection on YouTube Using Video Captions

arXiv 2107.00941 ↗First posted 2 Jul 2021cs.LG cs.CLcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Millions of people use platforms such as YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, and other mass media. Due to the accessibility of these platforms, they are often used to establish a narrative, conduct propaganda, and disseminate misinformation. This work proposes an approach that uses state-of-the-art NLP techniques to extract features from video captions (subtitles). To evaluate our approach, we utilize a publicly accessible and labeled dataset for classifying videos as misinformation or not. The motivation behind exploring video captions stems from our analysis of videos metadata. Attributes such as the number of views, likes, dislikes, and comments are ineffective as videos are hard to differentiate using this information. Using caption dataset, the proposed models can classify videos among three classes (Misinformation, Debunking Misinformation, and Neutral) with 0.85 to 0.90 F1-score. To emphasize the relevance of the misinformation class, we re-formulate our classification problem as a two-class classification - Misinformation vs. others (Debunking Misinformation and Neutral). In our experiments, the proposed models can classify videos with 0.92 to 0.95 F1-score and 0.78 to 0.90 AUC ROC.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2021.

Builds on

11 of 66 references.

References · 11

  1. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  2. 2017Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspectivecited by 334
  3. 2017Automatic Detection of Fake Newscited by 145
  4. 2018DeClarE: Debunking Fake News and False Claims using Evidence-Aware Deep Learningcited by 100
  5. 2019Attention in Natural Language Processingcited by 100
  6. 2018Automated Fact Checking: Task formulations, methods and future directionscited by 96
  7. 2018A Retrospective Analysis of the Fake News Challenge Stance Detection Taskcited by 49
  8. 2018A Survey of Fake News: Fundamental Theories, Detection Methods, and Opportunitiescited by 28
  9. 2020Identifying Possible Rumor Spreaders on Twitter: A Weak Supervised Learning Approachcited by 13
  10. 2019Rumor Detection on Social Media: Datasets, Methods and Opportunitiescited by 8
  11. 2019Neural Architectures for Fine-Grained Propaganda Detection in Newscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

12 papers.