mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Large DAGs by Combining Continuous Optimization and Feedback Arc Set Heuristics

arXiv 2107.00571 ↗First posted 1 Jul 2021cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Bayesian networks represent relations between variables using a directed acyclic graph (DAG). Learning the DAG is an NP-hard problem and exact learning algorithms are feasible only for small sets of variables. We propose two scalable heuristics for learning DAGs in the linear structural equation case. Our methods learn the DAG by alternating between unconstrained gradient descent-based step to optimize an objective function and solving a maximum acyclic subgraph problem to enforce acyclicity. Thanks to this decoupling, our methods scale up beyond thousands of variables.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2021.

Builds on

9 of 25 references.

References · 9

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 793
  3. 2018DAGs with NO TEARS: Continuous Optimization for Structure Learningcited by 745
  4. 2020On the Role of Sparsity and DAG Constraints for Learning Linear DAGscited by 186
  5. 2013Learning Bayesian Networks: The Combination of Knowledge and Statistical Datacited by 185
  6. 2017Bayesian Network Learning via Topological Ordercited by 14
  7. 2017Learning Large-Scale Bayesian Networks with the sparsebn Packagecited by 10
  8. 2020Learning DAGs without imposing acyclicitycited by 10
  9. 2018Proximal Online Gradient is Optimum for Dynamic Regretcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.