Zombies in the Loop? Humans Trust Untrustworthy AI-Advisors for Ethical Decisions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Departing from the claim that AI needs to be trustworthy, we find that ethical advice from an AI-powered algorithm is trusted even when its users know nothing about its training data and when they learn information about it that warrants distrust. We conducted online experiments where the subjects took the role of decision-makers who received advice from an algorithm on how to deal with an ethical dilemma. We manipulated the information about the algorithm and studied its influence. Our findings suggest that AI is overtrusted rather than distrusted. We suggest digital literacy as a potential remedy to ensure the responsible use of AI.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2021.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1.
2 papers.
- 2023The moral authority of ChatGPTcited by 11
- 2022AI, Opacity, and Personal Autonomycited by 5
- 2023The moral authority of ChatGPT13 Jan 2023
- 2022AI, Opacity, and Personal Autonomy25 Sep 2022