Evaluation of Thematic Coherence in Microblogs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Collecting together microblogs representing opinions about the same topics within the same timeframe is useful to a number of different tasks and practitioners. A major question is how to evaluate the quality of such thematic clusters. Here we create a corpus of microblog clusters from three different domains and time windows and define the task of evaluating thematic coherence. We provide annotation guidelines and human annotations of thematic coherence by journalist experts. We subsequently investigate the efficacy of different automated evaluation metrics for the task. We consider a range of metrics including surface level metrics, ones for topic model coherence and text generation metrics (TGMs). While surface level metrics perform well, outperforming topic coherence metrics, they are not as consistent as TGMs. TGMs are more reliable than all other metrics considered for capturing thematic coherence in microblog clusters due to being less sensitive to the effect of time windows.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2021.
Builds on
10 of 53 references.
References · 10
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
- 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,027
- 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
- 2019MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distancecited by 415
- 2020BERTweet: A pre-trained language model for English Tweetscited by 346
- 2020Pre-training is a Hot Topic: Contextualized Document Embeddings Improve Topic Coherencecited by 121
- 2015Analysing How People Orient to and Spread Rumours in Social Media by Looking at Conversational Threadscited by 62
- 2019Topic Modeling with Wasserstein Autoencoderscited by 53
- 2018Improving Topic Models with Latent Feature Word Representationscited by 28
- 2017Supporting the use of user generated content in journalistic practicecited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3.
3 papers.