mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Segmentation with Multiple Acceptable Annotations: A Case Study of Myocardial Segmentation in Contrast Echocardiography

arXiv 2106.15597 ↗First posted 29 Jun 2021cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most existing deep learning-based frameworks for image segmentation assume that a unique ground truth is known and can be used for performance evaluation. This is true for many applications, but not all. Myocardial segmentation of Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography (MCE), a critical task in automatic myocardial perfusion analysis, is an example. Due to the low resolution and serious artifacts in MCE data, annotations from different cardiologists can vary significantly, and it is hard to tell which one is the best. In this case, how can we find a good way to evaluate segmentation performance and how do we train the neural network? In this paper, we address the first problem by proposing a new extended Dice to effectively evaluate the segmentation performance when multiple accepted ground truth is available. Then based on our proposed metric, we solve the second problem by further incorporating the new metric into a loss function that enables neural networks to flexibly learn general features of myocardium. Experiment results on our clinical MCE data set demonstrate that the neural network trained with the proposed loss function outperforms those existing ones that try to obtain a unique ground truth from multiple annotations, both quantitatively and qualitatively. Finally, our grading study shows that using extended Dice as an evaluation metric can better identify segmentation results that need manual correction compared with using Dice.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2021.

Builds on

7 of 17 references.

References · 7

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  2. 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,223
  3. 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,186
  4. 2018nnU-Net: Self-adapting Framework for U-Net-Based Medical Image Segmentationcited by 291
  5. 2019Learning From Noisy Labels By Regularized Estimation Of Annotator Confusioncited by 127
  6. 2019Let's agree to disagree: learning highly debatable multirater labellingcited by 16
  7. 2019Machine Vision Guided 3D Medical Image Compression for Efficient Transmission and Accurate Segmentation in the Cloudscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.