mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Rethinking Token-Mixing MLP for MLP-based Vision Backbone

arXiv 2106.14882 ↗First posted 28 Jun 2021cs.CVcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In the past decade, we have witnessed rapid progress in the machine vision backbone. By introducing the inductive bias from the image processing, convolution neural network (CNN) has achieved excellent performance in numerous computer vision tasks and has been established as de facto backbone. In recent years, inspired by the great success achieved by Transformer in NLP tasks, vision Transformer models emerge. Using much less inductive bias, they have achieved promising performance in computer vision tasks compared with their CNN counterparts. More recently, researchers investigate using the pure-MLP architecture to build the vision backbone to further reduce the inductive bias, achieving good performance. The pure-MLP backbone is built upon channel-mixing MLPs to fuse the channels and token-mixing MLPs for communications between patches. In this paper, we re-think the design of the token-mixing MLP. We discover that token-mixing MLPs in existing MLP-based backbones are spatial-specific, and thus it is sensitive to spatial translation. Meanwhile, the channel-agnostic property of the existing token-mixing MLPs limits their capability in mixing tokens. To overcome those limitations, we propose an improved structure termed as Circulant Channel-Specific (CCS) token-mixing MLP, which is spatial-invariant and channel-specific. It takes fewer parameters but achieves higher classification accuracy on ImageNet1K benchmark.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2021.

Builds on

38 of 47 references.

References · 38

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  5. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  6. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
  7. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  8. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  9. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
  10. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,827
  11. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
  12. 2019CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers with Localizable Featurescited by 2,875
26 more
  1. 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,320
  2. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
  3. 2021Pyramid Vision Transformer: A Versatile Backbone for Dense Prediction without Convolutionscited by 1,960
  4. 2021MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Visioncited by 1,441
  5. 2021Tokens-to-Token ViT: Training Vision Transformers from Scratch on ImageNetcited by 1,096
  6. 2020Designing Network Design Spacescited by 954
  7. 2021CvT: Introducing Convolutions to Vision Transformerscited by 946
  8. 2017Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Eracited by 916
  9. 2021Multiscale Vision Transformerscited by 896
  10. 2021Going deeper with Image Transformerscited by 759
  11. 2021Transformer in Transformercited by 632
  12. 2021Twins: Revisiting the Design of Spatial Attention in Vision Transformerscited by 565
  13. 2021Conditional Positional Encodings for Vision Transformerscited by 402
  14. 2021Pay Attention to MLPscited by 367
  15. 2021Rethinking Spatial Dimensions of Vision Transformerscited by 361
  16. 2021ResMLP: Feedforward networks for image classification with data-efficient trainingcited by 338
  17. 2016FractalNet: Ultra-Deep Neural Networks without Residualscited by 216
  18. 2021Chasing Sparsity in Vision Transformers: An End-to-End Explorationcited by 181
  19. 2021Shuffle Transformer: Rethinking Spatial Shuffle for Vision Transformercited by 115
  20. 2021Beyond Self-attention: External Attention using Two Linear Layers for Visual Taskscited by 109
  21. 2017Shift: A Zero FLOP, Zero Parameter Alternative to Spatial Convolutionscited by 93
  22. 2021S2-MLP: Spatial-Shift MLP Architecture for Visioncited by 83
  23. 2021Do You Even Need Attention? A Stack of Feed-Forward Layers Does Surprisingly Well on ImageNetcited by 61
  24. 2021Container: Context Aggregation Networkcited by 37
  25. 2017Depthwise Separable Convolutions for Neural Machine Translationcited by 26
  26. 20194-Connected Shift Residual Networkscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 6; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

15 papers.

Sort: